The owner of high street fashion chain Zara posted better-than-expected profits after notching up sales growth across all its markets worldwide.
Inditex - the world's biggest clothing retailer - posted a 6% rise in net profits to 554 million euro (£438 million) for the three months to April 30 after seeing sales rise 17%, with currency movements stripped out.
It cheered like-for-like sales growth in all its markets, including the UK, with total sales hitting 4.9 billion euro (£3.9 billion) as it expanded its global footprint further and launched more online sites.
The group added that sales so far in the second quarter to June 13 were 15% higher on a constant-currency basis.
Rival fast-fashion firm H&M also posted figures showing a surge in sales last month, up 9% after poor performances in March and April.
H&M - which has 4,077 stores worldwide - said overall sales in its second quarter to May 31 were 5% higher.
Inditex said it added another 72 stores in 31 markets in its first quarter, taking its total to 7,085 stores in 91 markets.
It recently opened its first stores in Aruba, Nicaragua and Paraguay.
As well as Zara, the group also owns brands including Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius, Oysho and furnishings offering Zara Home.
Stradivarius opened its largest-ever store on London's Oxford Street in the group's first quarter.
Inditex's expansion created more than 11,930 new jobs in the quarter, of which 2,385 were in its domestic Spanish market.
Chairman Pablo Isla said: "Thanks to the group's strong growth we are able to generate jobs in all our business markets, most notably, in Spain."
Analysts at Liberum said Inditex's success comes from its "relentless focus on full price sales".
They added: "The company's continued delivery of the fashions that customers demand is underlined in today's sales update."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here